|
|
|
18
Oct 2002 |
|
|
Welcome to the
ancient art and science of astrology. I am confident you
will find your personal reading accurate, and I hope that you will find it
helpful in your life. |
Your Personal Reading
A well-liked and well-respected
person, you know a lot people, though that does not mean that you
necessarily enjoy everyone's company; on the contrary, sometimes
you feel that people who act the fool all the time can just be boring.
This might seem surprising to you, for if there is one thing that is
obvious to all of your friends is your sense of humour. In fact
it is
the first thing they would mention.
You feel and act younger than you
really are, so it is not
surprising that your sense of humour is so important a part of your
personality.
But you have a deeper insight born of genuine
intelligence, and this is the other main trait that shows through:
you can enjoy a laugh with the best of them, but underneath
it all there is intelligence and talent that you often feel could be
better used than in your present job. Have you ever
thought you could maybe write a book, but have never had the time? Or become
more involved in something like music? These are the sort of things
I'm picking up.
Another thing I detect: although
you like people, you can sometimes be a bit shy and unsure of
yourself. You hide it well, so your friends don't realise it,
but you do get these doubts sometimes. Sometimes you're too
private: don't be scared of confiding in a real friend.
To sum up: you are a very
special, humorous and intelligent person, and your friends always
appreciate you -
despite your occasional doubts.
|
The Foregoing
Waffle and shit of course, every single word of it,
for that "reading" was based entirely on the common conceits of human beings
everywhere, and instead of 250+ words I could so easily have waffled
on for 20 pages or more: I never even touched on your
appreciation of music, or the romantic side that you often keep
hidden, or any one of a hundred or so stock examples that relate to
most people in the world.
Yet "psychics" everywhere make good money just by
spouting this sort of thing, and people emerge from their caravans
oohing and aahing about how accurate the gypsy-wife was.
Add in the factor that the crystal-gazers have had many years
experience of summing people up, and of getting them to reveal things
without realising it, and you can see what mugs some people are.
So why are people so gullible?
Anyway, here are some episodes
from my own life, illustrating why I am becoming more and more hostile
to this sort of superstition. |
Madame Rosina
It was 1990 in Torquay, the sun was too hot for me,
and I was bored and tired, so on the spur of the moment I dropped into
Madame Rosina's. In the small waiting area there was one woman
before me. She was acompanied by a friend, and I soon realised
from their conversation that she had lost a son in a motorbike
accident. When it came to her turn the receptionist went
through to see Rosina, returning a minute or so later to usher
the woman through.
She emerged after 15 minutes, and said to her friend, "Oh, she's good.
She knew. The first thing she said to me was You're
grieving, aren't you? "
Well, even I could guess that
this came more from the receptionist than from any special powers, and
I felt it nothing less than fraudulent that Rosina should pretend to
know the woman's problems through second sight.
My own reading? Madame R
got everything wrong about me, and got more and more flustered as she
struggled to get back on track. In the end, she resorted to
asking me questions and then saying things like "Yes, I thought so".
The only thing I learned in her company was
that a tenner is better in your own wallet than in Madame Rosina's.
|
Numerology
January 2002, the programme is Richard and Judy (no I do not
generally watch it, thank you!) and in a couple of days it will be
02/02/2002. There in the studio is some ridiculous woman
declaring that two is the number of harmony, and that at two minutes
past 2am on the 2 Feb, the world will experience a suffusion of
harmony, or some such rubbish.
Bad enough that this nutcase should be invited to
appear on TV at all. What was even more depressing was that when
Richard started asking some much-needed and well-aimed questions, he
got glared at by Judy as if he was being rude,
and was generally cut off by her; she then started cooing
sympathetically with the "numerologist". Why did she do that? Surely no-one can really believe
that there is anything in 2/2/2002 that will produce magic in the
universe!
Richard's unanswered question was "On
what authority do you say that 2 is the number of harmony?" and I can
answer that, and other questions, for him right now:
- On no authority: it is just
made up. You might as well say that 14¾ is the number of
laziness. Who the hell's to say you're wrong?
- What does "the number of
harmony" mean anyway? Nothing at all. It is
meaningless, and even if it did have any meaning it would be
rubbish. Numbers are numbers, with no magical powers or even
any physical existence.
- Presumably the expected magic
would appear at hourly intervals that day in the various time zones,
carefully excluding from its calming effect any peoples who did not
use the same calendar. Give me strength!
I did not watch any more, and can
only hope that the spey-wife was run out of the studio by the scruff
of her neck. Depressingly, I don't suppose that happened. |
A Full Horoscope
Some years ago I thought a full astrological
reading would make a nice
birthday present for a
girlfriend, so having discovered the exact time of her birth, I sent
my cheque to Equinox of Covent Garden.
The book is fairly well-presented:
A4 size, with about 50 pages of charts and text. And if the various
charts of planetary positions mean little to me then I can
understand that it would be of interest to some people. But the
reason the book was never given as a gift (I ended up buying another
present instead) was the very poor quality of content. Page upon page of stuff that
probably bore no relationship to any one person's character - unless
you take the thing as a whole, and count the inclusion somewhere in
those pages of every human trait known to mankind.
I never believed at all in
astrology, but I did hope that the book would at least be better
written, and would make a good present. No such luck. |
A Possible Defence
Strangely
enough, I don't really knock people who go to palmists etc so long as
they realise in themselves that the lines on their hands (or whatever)
do not determine the futures of individuals. These
fortune-tellers will see hundreds of people each year, and to do their
job properly they will be very shrewd judges of character, and even
more adept at getting infrmation out of people. You would
imagine, too, that many people will consult crystal-gazers at
difficult times in their lives, so presumably sympathy and
understanding are there too. Did the woman who had lost
her son feel better for a talk with Madame Rosina? I suppose so,
and I also suppose she was given sensible and sympathetic advice.
So it is not all damnable.
It is still fraudulent, though, and I do not think it
is right to give comfort to people by telling lies. Doris
Stokes used to tell the audience at her shows, "I am getting a
white-haired old gentleman called (e.g.) George" - in the full
knowledge that someone in the hall would have had a grandfather called
George. Some people probably went away feeling the better
for it. As for me, I just don't like it.
|
|